Learn more about Stack Overflow the company, and our products. What the . How long and formal should a paper revision letter to the editor be? Our original resources for authors and journals will help you become an expert in academic publishing. And hope you hear from the journal soon! Hence, Nature prefers to stick with the original referees of a particular paper rather than to call in new referees to arbitrate, unless there is some specific way in which the referee can be shown to be technically lacking or biased in judgement. The journal opened for submissions on April 20, 2016. I've had Nature hold up papers for months and been forced out by a singe powerful reviewer with advice to publish the paper in another highly ranked (but not glamour mag) journal. Production :-) So, it probably means that the associate editor (AE), who handles the manuscript through the review and publication process, had a look at your manuscript and made a decision on it, most probably for rejection. Sometimes, the decision for the editor is really easy and quick and sometimes rather difficult and time-consuming. Currently working as an Assistant Editor for the Discover Journals under Springer Nature. 117. Under these circumstances, revised papers are not usually sent back to the referees because further technical work has not been required, but are accepted for publication once the editors have checked that the referees suggestions have been implemented and the paper is in the required format (the. Theoretically Correct vs Practical Notation. HANDBOOK: Keep calm and wait: A guide to understanding journal statuses. The first thing to do when you get a rejection is to take a deep breath and consider your options. This website is using a security service to protect itself from online attacks. Of these, about 100 came in as presubmission enquiries by e-mail (for which our median decision turnaround time is 3 days). By accepting all cookies, you agree to our use of cookies to deliver and maintain our services and site, improve the quality of Reddit, personalize Reddit content and advertising, and measure the effectiveness of advertising. the editor usually submits a brief comment on the article to the editor in chief who then has the final say and will make the decision available to you. Natureuses a transparent peer review system, where for manuscripts submitted from February 2020 we can publish the reviewer comments to the authors and author rebuttal letters of published original research articles. How did it go for you after this? 2002 Allegations of referee bias are seldom persuasive unless substantiated by strong evidence; we presume our referees are acting in good faith unless proved otherwise, and having sought their advice, we feel an obligation to take it seriously. I have experience with the manuscript submission process, from submission to peer review, to acceptance/rejection. Make sure that your arguments are backed by solid evidence. It could mean just about anything. What does this mean and should I contact the editor? At times, they may ask you to revise and resubmit the manuscript. At each stage, the editor will discuss the manuscript with editorial colleagues in the light of referees reports, and send a letter to the author offering one of the following options: Editors letters also contain detailed guidance about the papers format and style where appropriate (see below), which should be read in conjunction with the manuscript formatting guide when revising and resubmitting. A final decision on publication is deferred, pending the authors response to the referees comments. Research suggests that . Thus, in rejecting an appeal, we do not intend to imply that our initial decision was flawless, only that the arguments for reconsideration were not sufficiently convincing to exceed the deliberately high threshold for reversing a decision. There isnt any secret code to deciphering the submission tracker. 5 Answers. ]]> The difference between the phonemes /p/ and /b/ in Japanese, How to handle a hobby that makes income in US. Status has been "Ready for decision" for 25 days. It is up to the editor whether to accept or reject. Editor decision started might sound like the editor is going to bench reject your paper, but thats not necessarily the case. Although many decisions appear clear-cut, others are necessarily based on subtle distinctions between papers, and referees or editors can sometimes make mistakes. Hi! Share your stories! A group of my colleagues recently discussed scheduling about 25,000 words to 35,000 words per week for a typical edit, if there even is such a thing. Once the decision has been made to peer-review the paper, the choice of referees is made by the editor who has been assigned the manuscript, who will be handling other papers in the same field, in consultation with editors handling submissions in related fields when necessary. Authors are provided with an encrypted link to this system after their paper has been accepted. Most referees honour their prior agreement with Nature to deliver a report within seven days or other agreed time limit, and send their reports online. I have been working in the Scientific Publishing Industry for more than 3 years now. All Rights Reserved. Please avoid repeating information that is already present in the abstract and introduction. Does this mean a rejection letter is about to come? Peer review comments, cover letter and more. All Articles published in Nature go through at least one round of review, usually two or three, sometimes more. [CDATA[> Wishing you the best of luck on your paper. any technical failings that need to be addressed before the authors' case is established. Space in Nature is extremely limited, and so format requirements must be strictly observed, as advised by the editor handling the submission, and detailed in the manuscript formatting guide.